NPV vs IRR
NPV and IRR are both capital-budgeting tools. NPV tells you the dollar value an investment adds, while IRR tells you the percentage return. They often agree, but NPV is generally more reliable.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Aspect | NPV | IRR |
|---|---|---|
| Output | Net present value in dollars | Internal rate of return as a percentage |
| Input required | Discount rate and cash flows | Only cash flows |
| Decision rule | Accept if NPV > 0 | Accept if IRR > required rate of return |
| Reinvestment assumption | Uses the explicit discount rate | Assumes cash flows reinvest at the IRR |
| Multiple IRRs | Always gives a single value | Can produce multiple solutions for alternating cash flows |
When to Use Each
Use NPV
Use NPV when you need a dollar-value measure of value creation and you have a reliable discount rate.
Use IRR
Use IRR when communicating the percentage return of an investment or comparing projects of different sizes.
Verdict
NPV is generally preferred for decision-making because it directly measures value added and avoids the multiple-IRR problem.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can NPV and IRR conflict?
Yes, with non-conventional cash flows or mutually exclusive projects of different scales.
Which is better for ranking projects?
NPV is better for ranking because it reflects absolute value creation.